APHC010252422018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 11120/2018 Between: 1. VEGIREDDY RAGHAVA, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.4-5-29/119, 3RD LANE, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, OLD GUNTUR POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not properly investigating into the Cr.No.157/2017 and filing charge sheet in C.C.No.462/2017 on the file of VI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur without any investigation is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Fundamental Principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the respondents to conduct re-investigation into the matter, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not properly investigating into the Cr.No.157/2017 and filing charge sheet in C.C.No.462/2017 on the file of VI Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur without any investigation is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Fundamental Principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the respondents to conduct re-investigation into the matter, and pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for official respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 11120 of 2018 17.07.2025 Mjl /*