Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182388 (ALL)

AVNISH KUMAR TRIVEDI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. P.W.D. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/10198/2025 · 2025-10-30

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10198 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 22nd September, 2025 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 2/ District Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from date after granting an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Lakhan Vishwakarma, Gaurav Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Avnish Kumar Trivedi And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. P.W.D. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 10198 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench