UGRASEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
/11347/2025 · 2025-11-20
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182371 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182371 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11347 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 229 of 2025, under sections – 137 (2), 65 (1) BNS, 363, 376 (3) IPC, 3 / 4 POCSO Act, Police Station – Jahagiraganj, District – Ambedkar Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR that the FIR was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was enticed by the applicant. Subsequently, in her statement under section 183 BNSS the victim did not support the prosecution case and stated that both of them have also married. Age of the victim is 17 – 18 years.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the statement of the victim and without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant, who is in jail since 18.9.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Ugrasen be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ugrasen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 20, 2025 mks BAIL No. 11347 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench