- 1 - RSA No. 861 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.861 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.SHANKAREGOWDA, S/O ANNAPPAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. 2. SMT.SHARADHAMMA W/O SHANKREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT HIRIYALU VILLAGE, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK - 573 103. …APPELLANTS [(BY SRI. JAGADEESH H T.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. SMT. GEETHA W/O LAKSHMISHA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. 2. SMT. NANJAMMA W/O RAMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT THIMMALAPUARA VILLAGE, GANDSI HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK - 573 103. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - RSA No. 861 of 2019 THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objection for fourth time. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2019. Now we are in the month of May 2023. It's been four years. So far office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of appellants. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25