HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14409 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following reliefs:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to select and appoint the petitioner - an Anganwadi Helper, on the unreserved and vacant seat of Anganwadi Worker at Amar Nagar - 1st as per G.O. dated 21.03.2023, as she is resident of Amar Nagar, Raebareli city and discharging her additional duty there for 12 years continuously with utmost satisfaction to her superiors. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties restraining them not to carry on recruitment process on the vacant post of Anganwadi Worker at Amar Nagar, without considering the claim of petitioner which is pending consideration since 21.03.2025 before respondent No.1. (iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay honorarium against the work being done by petitioner for 12 years as Anganwadi worker additionally, in light of order passed by Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal bearing No 652/2024 and affirmed by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhilasha Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Huma Alam .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate - Collectorate, Raebareli And Another .....Respondent(s) Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP bearing No 022472/2025 vide its order dated 13.08.2025." 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 16.12.2025 which are taken on record and as per which, it is submitted that petitioner's earlier claim has already been rejected vide order dated 16.12.2025 which has not been challenged. 4, In response thereto, learned counsel for petitioner submits that earlier claim of petitioner was with regard to absorption on the post of Anganwadi Worker whereas in the present case, petitioner is claiming promotion on the said post, since petitioner is currently employed as Anganwadi Helper and comes within the zone of consideration. 5. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. District Programme Officer, Vikas Bhawan, Raebareli - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 6. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. December 17, 2025 lakshman WRIA No. 14409 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench