IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10174/2025 Decided on: 25.06.2025 Mukesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. B.B. Vaid, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, Director of School Education, Himachal Pradesh is impleaded as respondent No.3. Registry to carry out necessary corrections in the cause title. 2. Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of several adverse family circumstances being faced by the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 petitioner, he preferred a representation on 09.06.2025 (Annexure P- 1) to respondent No.2 for his adjustment, indicating therein the vacancies, which are likely to arise in near future and where the petitioner can be easily accommodated. The said representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P-1), however, has till date not been decided by respondent No.2/competent authority. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy, within a period of ten days from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th June, 2025(rohit)