ii V IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Speciail Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12753 OF 202fi Between: Attar Azeezur Rehman, S/o. Attar Buran Saheb, Aged about 55 years, Occ: Business, R/o.D.No.63/30, Budan Sab Street, Trunk Road, Rayachoti YSR Kadapa District, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Minority Welfare Department, A.P. Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, 4fh and 5th Floor, Imdad Ghar, Opp, K.R. Market, Vijayawada Krishna District, A.P. 3. The Inspector Auditor Waqfs, YSR Kadapa District. Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction may more particularly one in the respondents more representation of the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the particularly the 2'"'* Respondent for not considering the petitioner's panel submitted before them on 14.04.2025 and 01.05.2025 for constituting the managing committee for the Wakf institution namely Shahi Jamia Masjid situated at Rayachoti town. YSR Kadapa District is being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, in violation of provisions of the Wakf Act, 1995 and Andhra Pradesh Functions and Duties) Regulations respondents more Wakf Managing Committee . 2009 and (Constitutions, consequentially direct the to consider the s panel dated 14.04.2025 and 01.05.2025 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the taw. particuiarly the 2nd Respondent representation of the petitioner' lA NO: 1 OF ?a9R Petition under Section 151 CPC stated in the affidavit filed i pleased to direct the respondents praying that in the circumstances may be more particularly the 2nd Respondent to petitioner's panel dated 14.04.2025 pass appropriate orders in accordance with the in support of the petition, the High Court consider the representation of the 01.05.2025 and and law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MASALEGAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: HIDAYATHULLA GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE SRI SHAIK KHAZA BASHA (SC FOR WAQF BOARD) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010252482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] ■]& FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 12753/2025 Between: Attar Azeezur Rehman ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MASALEGAR HIDAYATHULLA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following ORDER: Heard Sri Masalegar Hidayathulla, and Sri Shaik Khaza Basha, learned standing counsel for respondents 2 and 3. ...RESPONDENT{S) learned counsel for the petitioner 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 is not considering the representations dated 14.04.2025 and 01.05.2025 the petitioner requesting to constitute the Jamia Masjid, Rayachoti Town, YSR Kadapa District. 3. At the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner confined and would urge to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 14.04.2025 and 01.05.2025 (Ex.P1) made by the petitioner. made by managing committee for Shahi arguments 4. Learned standing counsel submitted that the CEO will plac6 the representations made by the petitioner under Ex.P1, before the A.P. Waqf Rule 22 of the Andhra Wakfs Managing Committee and duties) Regulations, 2009 (for short ‘the Board as per (constitutions, functions Regulations’). Thereafter, the committee will pass appropriate orders. the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the 5. Given merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage, with the consent of learned counsel on either side directing the learned CEO nd respondent to place the representations of the AP State Waqf Board-2 (Ex.P1) made by the petitioner, before the Waqf Board, Kadapa within three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the terms of Section 18 of learned Wakf Board shall pass appropriate orders i Rule 22 of the Regulations, within four (4) weeks. No in the Waqf Act, 1995 r/w order as to costs. miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- U.SRl DEVI assistant, REGIS^AR ffef^OFFICER As a sequel, pending //TRUE COPY// SEC To, District, A.P. 3. The Inspector Auditor Waqfs, YSR Kadapa District, 4 One CC to Sri Masalegar Hidayathulla Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to Sri Shaik Khaja Basha, SC for Waqf Board, Advocate [OPUC] 6 Two CCS to GP for Social Welfare, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies TF ^ -a it' f HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.12753 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS