Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182310 (ALL)

JAGDISH YADAV v. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMM. U.P. PRIMARY AGRI. COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETIES AYODHYA AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13969/2025 · 2025-12-03

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13969 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jaibind Singh Rathour and Mr. Ashwini Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 & 2. Notice to the respondent no.3 is hereby dispensed with as the present petition is being decided at the admission stage itself. Present petition has been filed with the following main prayer:- "A. To Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite party no. 2 & 3, to pay the balance amount of arrear of salary from November 2009 to June 2011 alongwith interest @ 12% per annum up to the date of actual payment." Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.3 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Misra, Anshuman Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashwini Kumar Ojha, Jaibind Singh Rathour Jagdish Yadav .....Petitioner(s) District Administrative Comm. U.P. Primary Agri. Cooperative Credit Societies Ayodhya And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.3/ B- PACCS/Sadhan Sahkari Samiti Limited within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.3 is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. December 3, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13969 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench