[2025:RJ-JP:32149] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7485/2025 1. Subhash Chand Yadav Son Of Late Shri Omprakash Yadav, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Village Jharora, Behror, Manchal, Alwar (Raj.) 2. Ghanshyam Yadav Son Of Late Shri Omprakash Yadav, Resident Of Village Jharora, Behror, Manchal, Alwar (Raj.) 3. Pushpendra Kumar Yadav Son Of Late Shri Omprakash Yadav, Resident Of Village Jharora, Behror, Manchal, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, District Kotputli-Behror. 3. Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Alwar. 4. Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Kotputli- Behror. 5. Deputy Director, Office Of Block Veterinary Medical And Health, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. 6. Sub Divisional Officer, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. 7. Tehsildar, Tehsil Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. 8. Patwari, Naredakalan, Behror, District Kotputli-Behror. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakash Jha, Adv.for Mr. Ashvin Garg, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that bypassing the provisions of Rajasthan Tenancy Rules, 1985 and [2025:RJ-JP:32149] (2 of 2) [CW-7485/2025] the Rules of 1963 which are formulated for allotment of unoccupied government agricultural lands for the construction of schools, colleges and other building of public utility, the respondents have granted/permitted entry of excess charagah land in the revenue records and allotted the same for construction of building like veterinary hospital at Behror, thereby affecting and effecting the rights of the petitioners. It is further submitted that qua the same, the petitioners have traveled from pillar to post and have filed various representations before the concerned authorities (Annexure-15 reflected at Page 56 & 58 of petition), however, the same are not considered by the competent authorities/ respondents. 2. Having heard and considered the matter and relying upon the judgment of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuq-&1@2012), this Court deems it apposite to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the concerned Collector, Kotputli/Bahror to consider the representation of the petitioners and decide the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law from the date of passing of this order, positively. 3. Present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /28