NEHA IDRIS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9795/2024 · 2025-11-11
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182307 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9795 of 2024 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party no.1 and Sri Mohd. Fahim, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no.2. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of entire proceedings of Warrant or Summons Criminal Case No.71953 of 2023, Aabida Khatoon Vs. Neha Idris and others, under Sections 325 and 504 IPC, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow as well as the summoning order dated 10.09.2024 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Court No.27, Lucknow. 3. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 29.10.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-SA1 to the supplementary affidavit, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shamshad Ahmad Khan, Mohd. Tariq Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ashhad Ali, Mohd Fahim Neha Idris .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 6. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 17.11.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7.
For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid criminal case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the complainant after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. November 11, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 9795 of 2024 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench