HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1832 of 2025 Court No. - 31 HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. .. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all seven cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application. 3. Thereafter seven cases have been imposed upon the applicant by different police station which are as follows:- (A) Case crime No. 119/2025, Under Section- 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) Β.N.S. Police Station-Madivaon, District- Lucknow. (B) Case crime No. 256/2025, Under Section 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station-Madiyaon, District- Lucknow. (C) Case crime No. 443/2025, Under Section- 305(a), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station-Madiyaon, District-Lucknow. (D) Case crime No. 445/2025, Under Section- 305(A), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station-Madiyon, District-Lucknow. (E) Case crime No. 447/2025, Under Section- 304(2), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S. Police Station-Madiyon, District-Lucknow. (F) Case crime No. 363/2025, Under Section- 305(A), 331(4), B.N.S. Police Station-Sushant Golf City, District-Lucknow. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Umesh Kumar Maurya, Vikas Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amaan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (G) S.T. Case No. 379/2017, Under Section- 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act Police Station-Saadatganj, District-Lucknow. 4 . Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in seven cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all seven cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases. 5. Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition. 6. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all the seven cases mentioned in paragraph-5 of the application and release the applicant on bail. 7. Application stands disposed of. November 17, 2025 Shahnaz NA528 No. 1832 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench