HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6368 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vishal Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar to decide Restoration Application dated 09.04.2025 filed against order dated 27.03.2025, passed in Case No. 4485 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202404040204485) - Rakesh Vs. Santram Gaur, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Jalalpur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Restoration Application dated 09.04.2025 filed against order dated 27.03.2025, passed in Case No. 4485 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. T 202404040204485) - Rakesh Vs. Santram Gaur, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. In case petitioners fail to appear before the Court/authority concerned on each date of listing, then benefit of this order shall not be available to them. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 30, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishal Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Rakesh .....Petitioner(s) Tehsildar, Tehsil Jalalpur, Ambedkar Nagar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench