DEEPU MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/7257/2025 · 2025-10-29
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182267 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182267 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7257 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record. 2.It is alleged in the prosecution case that the accused applicant along with co-accused have attacked and inflicted grievous injuries upon the informant and his family members on 4.3.2025 during marriage ceremony. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. The applicant has explained criminal history of three cases in paragraph 41 of the bail application. General allegations has been made against all the assailants in the prosecution case by the injured. All the six injured have suffered simple injuries. Charge sheet has been filed. It is submitted that the co-accused Anshul Yadav @ Abhishek has been granted bail vide order dated 28.7.2025 passed by this court in Bail Application No.6147 of 2025. He seeks parity with the bail order of the said co-accused. The applicant is in jail since 6.3.2025. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released on bail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. 4.Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepu Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant has explained criminal history of three cases, charge sheet has been filed, the applicant seeks parity with the bail order of the co-accused, named above, who has been granted bail by this Court, general allegation has been levelled in the prosecution case, injuries received by the injured, arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the period for which the applicant is in jail and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. 6.Accordingly the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 7.
Let the applicant Deepu Maurya, involved in Case Crime No. 0087 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Unchahar, district Raebareli, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A I.P.C. (now 269 BNS). (vi) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date BAIL No. 7257 of 2025 2
fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A I.P.C. (now 209 BNS). October 29, 2025 Madhu D.R/P.S BAIL No. 7257 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench