Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18226 (KAR)

MRS. SHANTHI B v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5558/2025 · 2025-02-27

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8532 WP No. 5558 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 5558 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. SHANTHI B WIFE OF MR. BHASKAR. V., AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS RESIDING AT 10/72, 2ND MAIN ROAD, LAGGERE, F.F. COLONY, BANGALORE-560 058, 2. MR. BHASKAR. V. SON OF MR. VENKATESHULU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS RESIDING AT 10/72, 2ND MAIN ROAD, LAGGERE, F.F. COLONY, BANGALORE-560 058. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M B CHANDRACHOODA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NAGAMANJU K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUTHDA, DR. ABEDEKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8532 WP No. 5558 of 2025 BBMP, N.R. SQUARE BENAGLURU-560 002. 3. THE ZONAL COMMISSIONER EAST ZONE BBMP N.R. SQUARE BENAGLURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, AGA FOR R1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE PROCEEDINGS BEFORE ISSUING THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 248(3) OF BBMP ACT 2020 DATED 12/02/2025. BBMP/VAA/PAVA/PR/08/2024- 25 ISSUED RESPONDENT NO.3. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. As against the impugned order passed under Section 248(3) of the BBMP Act, there is admittedly a remedy of an appeal. 2. In that view of the matter, it would be appropriate to relegate the petitioner to the remedy provided under - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8532 WP No. 5558 of 2025 the statute i.e., an appeal before the Chief Commissioner. 3. This writ petition is therefore dismissed, reserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned order. 4. Until the consideration of the appeal, there shall be an interim stay of the order of confirmation. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11