PINTU BABU v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION andORS
WRIA/17826/2016 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182245 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 17826 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 26, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramesh Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajiv Singh Chuahan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pintu Babu .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Basic Education Andors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench