Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182239 (ALL)

M/S GREATVALUE PROJECTS INDIA LIMITED THRU. AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY SHRI RAJEEV CHATURVEDI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

A227/6415/2025 · 2025-11-11

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6415 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Apoorva Tewari, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rahul Shukla, the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State, Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no.2 to 4-New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and its officers. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by non-consideration of interim relief application filed in Revision No.104Appeal/77-4-2025 pending before the State Government and the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction restraining the opposite parties from taking coercive measures in respect of Plot No.GH02, Sector 107, Noida during pendency of interim relief application filed in the aforesaid revision. The petitioner has further sought a relief for restraining the opposite party no.2 from taking any coercive measures against the petitioner in furtherance of order dated 29.10.2025, passed by the Noida Authority. 3. Sri Waseeq Uddin Ahmed, the learned counsel for the opposite parties no.2 to 4 has made a statement at the bar on the basis of instructions provided to him that the order dated 29.10.2025 is being withdrawn and the authorities will pass a fresh order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kartikey Dubey, Apoorva Tewari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Waseeq Uddin Ahmed M/S Greatvalue Projects India Limited Thru. Authorized Signatory Shri Rajeev Chaturvedi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Infrastructure And Industrial Development Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Therefore, the petitioner's grievance against the order dated 29.10.2025 does not survive. 5. So far as the pendency of revision before the State Government is concerned notice has already been issued to the Noida Authority on 16.10.2025. 6. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the State Government to decide the application for interim relief within three weeks from today and to dispose of the Revision No.104Appeal/77-4-2025 by a reasoned and speaking order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned expeditiously in accordance with law. November 11, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6415 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench