HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10173 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Sri Prashant Shukla, Advocate has filed power of Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra on behalf of respondent No.4 alongwith counter affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Anjani Kumar Dvivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Prashant Shukla, holding brief of Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 3. This petition has been filed challenging an F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.0541/2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S. and Section 3(2)(va) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and they have entered into a compromise, which has been annexed as Annexure No.5 to the petition, and the respondent No.4 has agreed for quashing of the F.I.R. Thus, he submits that the impugned F.I.R. may be quashed. 5. Sri Prashant Shukla, holding brief of Sri Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 does not dispute the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that since the parties have settled their dispute amicably, therefore, the impugned F.I.R. may be quashed on the basis of compromise. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anjani Kumar Dvivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Krishna Nand Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that Charge Sheet dated 04.11.2025 has been forwarded to the Supervisory Authority against the petitioner only and in regard to the remaining accused, investigation is still pending, therefore, the petitioner may file the compromise before the Supervisory Authority, who may consider and forward the same accordingly. To which, there is no objection by learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent No.4. 7. In view of above, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file the compromise before the Supervisory Authority within a week from today, who shall consider the same and take decision on the Charge Sheet and may remit the matter to the Investigating Officer concerned also for submitting a report accordingly. 8. Original compromise, annexed with this petition, shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner forthwith after keeping photostat copy thereof on record. November 10, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 10173 of 2025 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench