Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182196 (ALL)

RISHABH BAJPAI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPTT. LKO AND OTHERS

CRLP/4001/2025 · 2025-12-05

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4001 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vineet Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for respondents no.1 and 2, and Sri Sandeep Kumar Trivedi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0077 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Harchandpur, District Raebareli . 3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 05.12.2025 sent by Sri Harikesh Singh, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Harchandpur, District Raebareli, states that a charge sheet has been submitted in the Court on 08.10.2025. 4. Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioners/accused is borne out. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioners in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vineet Kumar Mishra, Shubhank Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sandeep Kumar(Trivedi) Rishabh Bajpai And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary, Home Deptt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) 1287. 6. Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioners in the writ petition no case on merits is made out. 7. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to them. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. December 5, 2025 A. Katiyar CRLP No. 4001 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench