Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182191 (MAD)

S.Sumathy v. S.Annamalai

A/6747/2023 · 2025-12-08

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A.No.6747 of 2023 in C.S.No.200 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A NO. 6747 of 2023 in CS NO. 200 OF 2020 S.Sumathy .. Applicant Vs 1.S.Annamalai 2.Pushpa 3.Daisy Rani 4.Deepika 5.Lokesh .. Respondents PRAYER : This application is filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order 8 Rule 9 of CPC.to receive the reply statement of the applicant/plaintiff in view of the facts and circumstances as stated in the affidavit filed by the applicant in C.S.No.200 of 2020 pending on the file of this Court. For Applicant : M/s.C.Rajan For R1 & R2 : M/s.B.A.Prakash ORDER https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.No.6747 of 2023 in C.S.No.200 of 2020 This application has been filed to receive the reply statement of the applicant/plaintiff. P.DHANAPAL, J. kkd 2. According to the applicant, he is the plaintiff in the main suit and the defendants filed their written statement. Thereafter, the defendants filed an application in A.No.2858 of 2023 to amend the written statement and the same was allowed. Therefore, the applicant has now filed this application to file reply to the amended written statement. 3. The other side have not filed a counter affidavit in this application. The application pertains to the year 2024, they have not chosen to file any objection and written statement has already been amended by the respondents/defendants. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.No.6747 of 2023 in C.S.No.200 of 2020 4. Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit, the nature of application and the facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed. 08.12.2025 kkd A N o. 6747 of 202 3 in CS N o. 2 00 OF 202 0 (1/5) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis