MOHAMMAD ADNAN v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
CRLP/10309/2025 · 2025-11-07
Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182190 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182190 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10309 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 1 to 4. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 5 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. Instant criminal writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the First Information Report dated 28.09.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0539 of 2025 under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 109 (1), 309 (4), 115 (2), 352, 351 (3), 324 (4) of B.N.S, 2023 and Section 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 at Police Station- Kotwali Nagar District- Ayodhya. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the aforesaid First Information Report has been lodged on account of road wage which had happened on account of an accident that had been taken place. Contention is that despite the petitioner being not named in the First Information Report, the respondent-authorities are harassing the petitioner. On the other hand, learned AGA on the basis of instructions send by Sri Amar Singh, Sub Inspector, Police Station- Kotwali District- Ayodhya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Shukla, Devansh Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohammad Adnan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
states that the name of the petitioner is not indicated in the said First Information Report. He further states that the other persons whose name has been indicated in the First Information Report, have been arrested. He also contends that the investigation is still going on. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to not take any coercive action against the petitioner till such time any credible evidence is found against the petitioner. November 7, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 10309 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench