Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182176 (ALL)

RAM ABHILAKH SHUKLA v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE /COLLECTOR PRATAPGARH DISTT. PRATAPGARH AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10360/2025 · 2025-11-10

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10360 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has made following main prayer(s): "[I] Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of 'Mandamus' thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties specially opposite party No. 2 & 3 to removed the electric connection of opposite party No. 4 from the personal electric HT line-11000 of the petitioner, in the interest of justice." 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, learned counsel for the petitioner has decided to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned by making a representation for redressal of his grievance. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 5. In light of the same, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move a representation with regard to his grievance, which he is facing relating to electric fluctuation, before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vyas Narayan Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amarjeet Singh Rakhra Ram Abhilakh Shukla .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate /Collector Pratapgarh Distt. Pratapgarh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) authority concerned, who shall consider the same in accordance with law. November 10, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10360 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench