KAMINI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PANCHAYATI RAJ U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/13318/2025 · 2025-11-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182173 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182173 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13318 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Preliminary objection is raised that the writ petition is not maintainable as the order under challenge is passed by District Magistrate Kanpur. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has failed to refute the aforesaid preliminary objection. In view of the above, the instant petition is hereby dismissed as not maintainable. Consigned to the records. November 19, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar, Prabhakar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Kamini .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj U.P. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench