HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10881 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. Upon due consideration to the averments made by parties, it appears that there is a private dispute between the parties accordingly, we are of the view that we cannot pass any orders in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate court for redressal of their grievance. November 11, 2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhirendra Kumar Mishra, Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Anita Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench