Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182149 (MAD)

M. PRADEEPKUMAR v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/34597/2025 · 2025-12-17

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.34597 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.34597 of 2025 M.Pradeepkumar ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, V-6, Kolathur Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.332 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest by the respondent in Crime No.332 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Anbazhagan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ****** O R D E R 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34597 of 2025 The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(2), 351(3) of BNS and under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2022, in Crime No.332 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant and due to a wordy quarrel, he attacked her with an iron rod and punched her eyes, causing severe injuries. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case and he was not involved in the above said offence. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, hence sought for anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing the anticipatory bail, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that severe injuries were caused to the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34597 of 2025 defacto complainant, and her eyes were also severely damaged. Hence, he opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Considering the nature of the allegations and the fact that the victim has sustained grievous injuries all over her body, this Court is not inclined to allow this Criminal Original Petition. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 17.12.2025 gbi To 1. The Inspector of Police, St.Thomas Mount-Police Station, Chennai District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.34597 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. gbi Crl.O.P. No.34597 of 2025 17.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis