- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11858-DB CCC No. 237 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 237 OF 2025 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: MR. VINOD SINGH SON OF LATE JAI SINGH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.403, B BLOCK, BLOOMSBURY APARTMENTS, NO.23/4, BENSON ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE - 560 046 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. PRADEEP C. YADAV, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. P. NISHAN UNNI S. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE INDUS TOWERS LIMITED NO.12, TOWER-D, SUBRAMANYA ARCADE, 7TH FLOOR, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, OLD GURAPPANAPALYA, BTM LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 027 2. MR. H. REHANULLA SHARIFF SON OF HABIBULLA SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. MRS. UMMARA BEGUM WIFE OF H. REHANULLA SHARIFF AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, Digitally signed by CHAITHRA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11858-DB CCC No. 237 of 2025 R2 AND R3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.7, ROYAPPA ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, PULAKESHINAGAR, BANGALORE- 560 005 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. S.G. RAGHAVENDRA, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS TO TAKE CONTEMPT ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR WILFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 09.12.2024 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN WP NO.32891/2024 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Since the order brought under contempt jurisdiction is an interim order, which factum could not be disputed by learned advocate Mr. Pradeep C Yadav for the complainant, the court is not inclined to exercise the jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the simple reason that at this stage, no rights of the parties could be said to have been finally crystallized. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11858-DB CCC No. 237 of 2025 2. The merits of subject matter including the interim order is at large before learned Single Judge in the proceedings of the writ petition, to be considered on their own merits. 3. Therefore, leaving the petitioner to work out his rights and remedies, including the plea of breach of injunction, before learned Single Judge, where the writ petition is pending, this contempt petition is not entertained. Hence, it stands dismissed without going into the merits. Sd/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9