NIRMAL YADAV AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1884/2024 · 2025-11-18
Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182125 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182125 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1884 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioners and, as such, the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach appropriate forum at appropriate stage. November 18, 2025 kkv/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ratnesh Kant Agnihotri, Ranjana Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Nirmal Yadav And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench