Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18212 (GAU)

AJAY JAISWAL v. TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD AND 2 ORS

WP(C)/6159/2022 · 2025-01-23

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010190392022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6159/2022 AJAY JAISWAL S/O LATE SUKHDEV JAISWAL, ADD-KAMAKHYA NAGAR, FCI, TINSUKIA, P.O.-TINSUKIA, P.S.-TINSUKIA, DIST-TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786125 VERSUS TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD AND 2 ORS (A STATUTORY BODY CONSTITUTED AND GOVERNED UNDER THE ASSAM MUNICIPAL ACT. 1956), REGD. OFF.-RANGAGORA ROAD, P.O.- TINSUKIA, DIST-TINSUKIA, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PIN-786125 2:THE CHAIRMAN TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD REGD. OFF.-RANGAGORA ROAD P.O.-TINSUKIA DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 3:EXECUTIVE OFFICER TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD RANGAGORA ROAD P.O.-TINSUKIA DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-78612 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, MR J A KAZI,MS T WAPANGLA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 24-01-2025 Heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.S. Roy, learned State counsel for the respondents No.1, 2 and 3 submits that godown in Makum Road, Tinsukia, which was sealed, has been de-sealed. Since the grievance raised is against the sealing of the godown, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant