Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182117 (ALL)

MOHD. FAIYAZ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

/11859/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11859 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.445 of 2025, under Section 64(2)(da), 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, Section 66D, 66E of I.T. Act & Section 3/5/(3) of U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, P.S. Dewa, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the informant is a social worker and a spiritual person; she met with the applicant and some inappropriate photos were taken and thereafter, physical relations were formed on various occasions. She also alleged that she was being mentally harassed. It was also alleged that certain religious statements were made to her and threats were issued. It was also stated that she was being forced to commit suicide. In the statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim stated that the informant met the applicant and thereafter, she was mind-washed and she started living in depression and thereafter, password was hacked and inappropriate photos were uploaded on fake ID. Statements with regard to religious insinuations were also made. The victim refused to undergo medical examination. Tentative age of the victim is 40 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the relationship lasted over a substantial time Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Piyush Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Faiyaz .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) even as per the FIR allegations and the refusal of the victim to undergo medical examination, the applicant who is in custody since 03.09.2025 and has explained his criminal antecedents of one case, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohd. Faiyaz be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11859 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench