SONU AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/196/2025 · 2025-11-26
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182110 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182110 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 196 of 2025
. Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant was enlarged on interim anticipatory bail on 11.02.2025 and there is no material to demonstrate that the applicant has misused the liberty.
3. Considering the aforesaid fact that the interim bail granted vide order dated 11.02.2025 is confirmed and the applicant, namely, Sonu & Dev Saran @ Dev Saran Rajput is granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of the trial with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avnish Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sonu And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
(d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court.
4. The anticipatory bail application is allowed in above terms. November 26, 2025 akverma ABAIL No. 196 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench