HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12847 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties to pay the full amount Rs 10,78,846/- of gratuity to the petitioner on the basis of his total length of service i.e. 34-year w.e.f. 11.03.1991 to 31.01.2025 on the class IV post along with interest providing the benefit of the judgment Yatendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and others dated 10.02.2025, in the interest of justice. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding commending to the opposite parties to pay the amount toward commutation of pension to the petitioner on the basis of total length of service period i.e. 34 years with effect to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Tripathi, Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Kashi Ram Alias Kashi Ram Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Women Welfare Anubhag I Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 11.03.1991 to 31.01.2025 on the class IV post providing the benefit of the judgment Yatendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and others dated 10.02.2025, in the interest of justice. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commending to the opposite parties decide the representation on dated 12.09.2025 within stipulated time period which is pending before the opp. party no.2. which is annexed as Annexure no.2 with the writ petition." 3. It has been submitted that petitioner's case is fully covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ A No.12503 of 2024; Yatendra Singh versus State of U.P. & Ors. which was allowed by means of judgment and order dated 10.02.2025. 4. It has been submitted that the aforesaid judgment has already been complied with by opposite parties on 13.05.2025. 5. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. Director, Women Welfare Civil Secretariat, Jawahar Bhawan, Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in the light of judgment rendered in the case of Yatendra Singh (supra) in case the same is applicable within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. WRIA No. 12847 of 2025 2 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 12847 of 2025 3 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench