APHC010262922025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13261/2025 Between: Patan Ameer Khan and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of Respondents on Petitioners Meeseva application vide TAAPDL012100194236 dated 04 05 2021 submitted for deleting Petitioners landed property in an extent of Ac 3 00 Cents out of Ac 21 48 cents Covered by Survey No 533/2 of Rayachoty Town and Mandal Annamayya District from the list of prohibited properties for registration under section 22A 1a of Registration Act 1908 as illegal irregular irrational amounts to nondischarge of legal obligation conferred on them under the provisions of Registration Act 1908 and offends Articles 14 21 and 300A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to delete petitioners said land from the list of Prohibited Properties for registration by deciding the said application and pass other order or orders...” 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the absolute owner of the agriculture landed property admeasuring to an extent of Ac.3.00 Cents out of Ac. 21.48 cents in Sy.No.533/2 of Rayachoty Town & Mandal, Annamayya District and having acquired the same from his vendor and predecessor Shaik jilani Basha, Syed Mahajabean, Shaik Muneera and Syed Mubeena under Registered Sale deed document bearing No.6992/2020, dated 22.07.2010 and he is in peaceful possession and rightful enjoyer of the said subject land. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner made an application to the respondent authorities seeking for deletion of the subject property from the list of prohibited properties under Section 22- A(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908, through the Integrated Service Delivery Gateway “Mee Seva,” vide Application No. TAAPDL012100194236, dated 04.05.2021. He further submits that the subject property is not under any legal restraint against alienation, particularly in light of successive alienations that have been duly registered by the respondent authorities as per the directions of this Court vide orders dated 18.03.2013 and 21.01.2021 in W.P.Nos.7568 of 2013 and 1515 of 202. He also contends that, despite the receipt of the petitioner’s application/representation dated 04.05.2021, the respondents have no lawful authority to continue listing the subject property under the prohibited properties list, especially considering that documents of conveyance related to the successive alienations have been already registered. Hence the writ petition. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that, the respondents’ authorities will consider the representation/application of the petitioner dated 04.05.2021 and pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time in accordance with law. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents, and on perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered view that the present writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents’ authorities to consider the application/representation of the petitioner, dated 04.05.2021, for deletion of the subject property from the prohibited list notified under Section 22- A(1)(a) of the Registration Act, 1908as expeditiously as possible, strictly in accordance with the law, preferably within a period of five (05) months from the date of receipt of this order after providing an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. 6. With the above direction the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.05.2025 RMD 320 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.13261 of 2025 09.05.2025 RMD