OM PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRINCI.SECRY. LOK NIRMAN VIBHAG and 2 ORS
WRIA/7682/2005 · 2025-10-31
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182077 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7682 of 2005 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Shri Mohd. Misbah, Advocate holding brief of Shri Y S Lohit, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the matter has become infructuous and nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition.
2. In view thereof, the present writ petition is dismissed as being infructuous, interim order, if any, is vacated.
3. File may be consigned to record room. October 31, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Y S Lohit Counsel for Respondent(s) :
C S C (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) Om Prakash Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Princi.Secry. Lok Nirman Vibhag And 2 Ors .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench