SUNIL RAM ALIAS SUNIL KUMAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5990/2025 · 2025-07-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18207 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 18207 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2025:JHHC:19609 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5990 of 2025
Sunil Ram @ Sunil Kumar Ram, aged about 21 years, S/o Nirnjan Ram, R/o Village Basaria, PO & PS-Chainpur, District- Palamau, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha , Addl. PP.
02 / 17.07.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chainpur P. S. case no. 81 of 2025 instituted under Section 309 (6) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted motorcycle and cash of Rs. 15,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 21 of the bail application and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the recovery of the looted motorcycle from his house. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.05.2025, as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail .
Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Palamau in connection with Chainpur P.S. case no. 81 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-