Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18205 (AP)

Tellam Jayamma v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/11350/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010252392019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11350/2019 Between: 1. TELLAM JAYAMMA, W/O. CHANTI ST, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O. RAMANNAKKAPETA VILLAGE, JEELUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JEELUGUMILLI PS, JEELUGUMILLI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. KORALAPATI SATYANARAYANA, S/O. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O. VANKAVARIGUDEM, JEEIUGUMILLI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declare the action of the respondents in not conducting investigation / enquiry in Cr.No.-.17/2018, dated- 05.09.2018 on the file of 4th respondent PS as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Cr.P.C. and consequentially direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 to complete the investigation and take necessary action pursuance to the Cr.No.117/2018 dated- 05.09.2018 on the file of 4th respondent PS and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 to take necessary action against the 5th respondent pursuance to the Cr.No.117/2018, dated- 05.09.2018 on the file of 4th respondent PS pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TELLAM NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11350 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through Video Conference and learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that after due investigation, the police referred the case as false and filed final report before the Court vide SR No.465/2020 dated 01.09.2020 and EF No.65840. 3. In that view of the matter, petitioner is at liberty to approach jurisdictional Magistrate, for filing objections on the final report, if any, in accordance with the law. 4. With the above observations, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is closed, at the stage of admission itself. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11350 of 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 PSA