PARDEEP NARAYAN ALIAS PRADEEP NARAYAN SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. SRI BALKAR SINGH AVAS AYUKTA, U.P. AVAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHAD LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
CAPL/1912/2025 · 2025-11-12
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182038 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1912 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Objection against the compliance affidavit filed by Respondent No.6 has been filed by the applicant today, which is taken on record. 2. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of order dated 9.4.2025 passed in Writ A No.3699 of 2025, the relevant para is quoted hereinbelow:
"14. Therefore, without entering into the merit of the issue, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to approach their Outsourcing Agency by moving representation for seeking protection in terms of the Government Order dated 25.02.2020 (supra) within a period of 15 days from today, taking all pleas and grounds and enclosing therewith copies of relevant document etc. which are necessary for disposal of the grievance of the petitioners. Such grievance of the petitioners would be considered by their Outsourcing Agency, which may be forwarded to the competent authority of the department, so that any appropriate decision may be taken in the case of the petitioners with expedition, preferably within a period of one month. It is needless to say that since the merits of the case has not been considered and this order has been passed considering the Government Order dated 25.08.2020 (supra), therefore, Outsourcing Agency may take Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Shukla, Aseem Misra, Kavita Mishra, Shahid Salam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta Pardeep Narayan Alias Pradeep Narayan Shukla And Another .....Applicant(s) Sri Balkar Singh Avas Ayukta, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Lko. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
appropriate steps independently strictly in accordance with law. "
3. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.6 has submitted that in compliance of judgment and order passed in the writ petition a decision has been taken by the Respondent No.6 in the light of Government Order dated 25.08.2020 and forwarded the same to the Assistant Housing Commissioner and the copy of which has been filed alongwith the compliance affidavit, hence the present contempt application has become infructuous and is liable to be dismissed as such. 4.
On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the decision taken by Respondent No.6 was never ever communicated to the applicant, which amounts to willful disobedience of the order passed in the writ court. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the record of the case, it is found that the direction was issued to Respondent No.6 to consider the grievance of the applicant and forward it to the competent authority so that appropriate decision may be taken and while considering the grievance of the applicant, Respondent No.6 may consider the Government Order dated 25.08.2020. 6. Respondent No.6 had taken decision on 18.04.2025 considering the provisions of Government Order dated 25.08.2020 in favour of the applicant and forwarded it to the Assistant Housing Commissioner, who is Respondent No.3 in the present contempt Case. The Respondent No.3 vide its order dated 9.6.2025 has passed an order for joining of the applicant at a new place of posting, copy of which has been annexed at Page 15 of the compliance affidavit filed by Respondent No.6, meaning thereby the Respondent No.6 after considering the Government Order recommended the case of the applicant to the Competent Authority and the Competent Authority had taken decision by passing order dated
20.05.2025. 7. In view of the fact and discussion made hereinabove, the judgement and order passed in the writ petition has been complied with, hence the present contempt application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as infructuous. CAPL No. 1912 of 2025 2
8. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. November 12, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 1912 of 2025 3 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench