Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182034 (ALL)

VIVEK PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

/8569/2025 · 2025-12-02

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8569 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Petition had earlier been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to pay retiral dues of father of petitioner. 3. It has been submitted that inadvertently, certain relevant pleadings and documents could not be made or annexed to the petition due to which fresh petition is required to be filed. 4. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh. December 2, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Awadhesh Kumar Tiwari, Kaushlendra Tewari (Manish Mathur,J.) Vivek Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench