PANKAJ CHAUDHARY and ORS. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
A482/868/2020 · 2025-12-04
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 182032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 868 of 2020 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he wants to withdraw the present application. On that, learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. December 4, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shishir Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Aditya Vikram Singh, Mohd. Shamshad Khan, Nadeem Murtaza (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Pankaj Chaudhary And Ors. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench