Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18203 (CAL)

KRISHNA TRADERS (NEW) AND ORS v. UGRO CAPITAL LTD

FMAT (ARBAWARD)/13/2024 · 2025-01-14

Biswaroop Chowdhury, Soumen Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Items 7. sg 14-01-2025 Ct. 12 FMAT (Arbaaward) 13 of 2024 Krishna Traders (New) & Ors. Versus Ugro Capital Ltd. Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee …for the appellants Mr. Paritosh Sinha Ms. Sonia Nandy …for the respondent 1. Although this appeal is not maintainable before a Division Bench, however, with regard to a fair stand taken by Mr. Paritosh Sinha, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent that an application has already been filed for withdrawal of the application in which the impugned order was passed, we dispose of the appeal on the basis of the statement made on behalf of the respondent. 2. This order shall not prevent the respondent to apply afresh before the learned Arbitral Tribunal upon prior notice to the appellant. 3. Under such circumstances, the appeal is disposed of with the above observation. 4. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.)