Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182025 (ALL)

MOHD. SHANU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO.

/11840/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11840 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.93 of 2020, under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 506, 34 IPC, P.S. Saadatganj, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that first bail application of applicant was rejected on 12.5.2022. While arguing the second bail application learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused have been enlarged on bail vide separate orders which are on record as annexures 2 and 3. It is further argued that the applicant is in custody since 14.4.2020 and only six witnesses out of total 29 witnesses have been examined, thus there is no likelihood of the trial being concluded in the near further. The applicant has no criminal history prior to the offence in question. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the co accused enlarged on bail and there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 14.4.2020 and has no criminal history prior to offence in question is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nadeem Murtaza, Adam Sultan, Anand Kanaujia, Parth Anand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Shanu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Mohd Shanu be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 28, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11840 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench