Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 182019 (ALL)

YUGVENDRA SINGH (PNO-050680072) AND 25 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12855/2025 · 2025-11-04

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12855 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of examination proceeding held on 05.10.2025 for recruitment on 176 vacant posts of Head Constable in the Motor Transport Division in pursuance of advertisement dated 15.09.2025. Prayer has also been sought for a direction for conducting fresh examination in pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement. 3. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned State counsel submits that appropriate directions of this Court have already been issued with regard to same dispute in Writ A No.12588 of 2025; Shiv Babu Mishra & 80 Ors. versus State of U.P. & Ors. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that although such directions have already been issued but certain evidences are also available with petitioners which may be directed to be considered by concerned authority. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Deepesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Yugvendra Singh (Pno-050680072) And 25 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. From examination of the order dated 28.10.2025 passed in case of Shiv Babu Mishra (supra), that directions have already been issued with regard to same dispute. The relevant portion is as follows: "6. In such circumstances, opposite party No.2, Director General of Police/Chairman of UPPRPB, Tulsi Ganga Complex, 19-C, Vidhansabha Marg, Lucknow is directed to consider grievance of petitioners and decide the same in light of any evidence which is produced by petitioners as also with regard to any evidence available with opposite parties themselves including CCTV footage. 7. After examination of aforesaid evidences, opposite party No.2 shall pass appropriate orders on the representation submitted by petitioners alongwith certified copy of this order and decision with regard to same shall be taken within a period of two weeks from the date of certified copy of this order is served upon opposite party No.2. 8. Considering said facts as also enunciated by Supreme Court in the case of Sachin Kumar and others (supra), it is directed that orders pertaining to representation of petitioners shall be passed prior to declaration of result of the examination held on 05.10.2025. 9. With the aforesaid direction(s), petition stands disposed of." 6. Since directions have already been issued by this Court earlier, there is no occasion to reiterate the same. WRIA No. 12855 of 2025 2 7. In view thereof, petitioners are also granted liberty to participate in the inquiry proceedings and to submit their evidence which may also be considered by authority. 8. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 12855 of 2025 3 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench