HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9561 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. There is no request for pass over or adjournment of the case. 2. This Court had passed the following order on 20.12.2024:- "Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned A.G.A. for State. This petition seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the First Information Report dated 01.03.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0085 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station-Chinhat, District-Lucknow. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the impugned F.I.R. is an outcome of matrimonial dispute and this dispute may be settled amicably through Mediation & Conciliation Centre, therefore, the matter may be referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court. Learned counsel for petitioners has further submitted that to show the bona fide, petitioners are ready and willing to place the demand draft of Rs.50,000/- in favour of respondent no.4-wife before this Court on the next date. Put up this case on 03.01.2025 in additional cause list amongst top ten cases. By the said date demand draft of Rs.50,000/- in favour of wife-respondent no.4 shall be placed before this Court. " 3. Perusal of the order sheet and the record indicates that the matter has not been pursued after passing of the aforesaid order. 4. Learned AGA, on the basis of instructions dated 14.12.2024 received from Rakhi Singh, Lady Sub Inspector, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow, which has been placed before this Court and taken on record, submits that the Charge Sheet dated 23.08.2024 complying provisions of Section 41A of Cr.P.C. has been forwarded to the concerned court, therefore, this petition has lost it's efficacy and the petitioners may have Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rohitash Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rohit Singh Yadav @ Chandan And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) remedy elsewhere consequent thereto. However, none is present to controvert the same. 5. In view of above, since prima facie the allegations against the petitioners have been found true on account of the evidence and material collected during investigation and the charge sheet has been forwarded and none is present to point out any irregularity or illegality in the same, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter. 6. Dismissed accordingly. November 28, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 9561 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench