Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181986 (ALL)

RAJ KUMAR @ SAJAN @ DEVENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/10354/2025 · 2025-11-03

Pankaj Bhatia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10354 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.128 of 2025 under Sections 103(1), 61(2) BNS (Section 302, 120-B IPC), P.S.- Jaitpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, namely, Ankur on the same allegation has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 29.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9153 of 2025. Therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in of the order dated 29.10.2025, ground of parity, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 18.06.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Raj Kumar @ Sajan @ Devendra Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Raj Kumar @ Sajan @ Devendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 Renu/- BAIL No. 10354 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench