LAVKUSH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/3637/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181984 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3637 of 2025 .
. Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant.
2. The applicants, namely, Lavkush and Uttam seek enlargement on bail in FIR No.42 of 2025, under Sections 70(2), 351(3) of BNS and Section 5G/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Khiro, District Raebareli.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the sister of the informant aged about 14 years was raped by the applicant. The statement of the victim is on record, which corroborate the allegation of rape. The medical report is also corroborate the allegation.
4. Considering the age of the victim, which is around 14 years and the evidence corroborating the allegation levelled in the FIR, no case for bail is made out.
5. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhakar Mishra, Poonam, Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lavkush And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. However, after the statement of the victim is recorded, it open to the applicant to file a fresh bail application. November 13, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 3637 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench