1 2025:CGHC:13051 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2499 of 2021 • The Gram Panchayat Dhaurabhta Through Its Sarpanch Smt. Durpati Wife Of Chitrakhan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Police Station Gidhpuri, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Collector Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4. Tahsildar Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5. Tameshwar S/o Dujram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 6. Maniram S/o Dujram Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 7. Nemichand S/o Dujram Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Dhaurabhata, Tahsil Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 8. The Naib Tahsildar Palari, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.19 17:42:39 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Dashrath Kushwaha, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 5,6,7 : Mr. Sobhit Koshta, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19. 03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mr. Kumar, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant