Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181968 (MAD)

J.GOVINDARAJAN v. The Inspector of Police

WP Crl./1639/2025 · 2025-12-15

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 __________Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-12-2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 J.Govindarajan S/o. Jayaraman ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector of Police Palaiyur Police Station, Palaiyur, Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 2. The Tahsildar Kuthalam Taluk, Kuthalam, Mayiladuthurai District. 3. J. Natarajan S/o. Jayaraman ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition (Crl.) is filed under Art.226 of Constitution of India seeking for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 05.11.2025 by conducting enquiry under the provision of Sec.174 of B.N.S.S.. For Petitioner(s): Mr. C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 __________Page 2 of 4 ORDER This Writ Petition (Crl.) has been filed seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent on the basis of the complaint lodged by the petitioner on 05.11.2025 by conducting enquiry under the provision of Sec.174 of B.N.S.S., 2023. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the 3rd respondent is the younger brother of the petitioner. He would further submit that the petitioner had given a complaint against the 3rd respondent and based on his complaint, enquiry was conducted in C.S.R.No.329 of 2025. He would also submit that during the enquiry, both parties have undertaken to settle their dispute among themselves, based on which, the enquiry had been closed and both parties have also been directed to approach the civil court for availing their appropriate remedy. 3. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor also served a copy of the closure report on the learned counsel for the petitioner today. 4. Recording the submissions of the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and also the factum of service of closure report on the learned counsel for the petitioner today, this Writ Petition (Crl.) stands closed. No costs. 15-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 __________Page 3 of 4 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RPP To 1. The Inspector of Police Palaiyur Police Station, Palaiyur, Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 2. The Tahsildar Kuthalam Taluk, Kuthalam, Mayiladuthurai District. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 __________Page 4 of 4 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J. RPP WP Crl. No. 1639 of 2025 15-12-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis