MIRZA ATAULLA BEG @ ATAULLA BEG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/7303/2025 · 2025-10-31
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 181955 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7303 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This application has been filed with the following prayer:-
"To quash the summoning order dated 31.08.2024 and entire proceedings of impugned charge-sheet dated 29.09.2001 arising out of F.I.R No. 59/2001, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S.- Misrikh, District- Sitapur."
3. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that vide order dated 02.09.2025, a direction was given to the court concerned to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned court concerned had verified the contents of compromise. 4. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the court concerned vide report/order dated 06.09.2025. 5. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the court concerned. 6. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mirza Ataulla Beg @ Ataulla Beg .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The summoning order dated 31.08.2024 and entire proceedings of impugned charge-sheet dated 29.09.2001 arising from F.I.R No. 59/2001, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S.- Misrikh, District- Sitapur are hereby quashed. 9. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith.
October 31, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 7303 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench