Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 18194 (CHH)

BALBHADRA MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2963/2025 · 2025-04-30

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19538 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2963 of 2025 1 - Balbhadra Mishra S/o Late Gopinath Mishra Aged About 55 Years At - Govindpur, Kanker P.S. Kanker, District Kanker, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, C.G. 2 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, C.G. 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, District Uttar Bastar Kanker, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Nagdev, Advocate appears through VC. For State : Mr. K.S. Saini, PL (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. By the present Petition, the petitioner is seeking direction towards the respondents to take a decision on the representation filed by the PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2025.05.01 11:35:24 +0530 2 petitioner before the Collector dated 21.03.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was serving as a daily wages employee in the Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kanker, District Uttar Bastar for a period of more than 24 years as a daily wager and on 13.12.2024, the service of the petitioner regularized on the post of Peon. He further submits that on the same day i.e. 13.12.2024, respondent No.3 cancelled the order of regularization. He would further submit that the petitioner has submitted a representation to the CEO, Janpad Panchayat Kanker as well as to the Collector Kanker, raising his grievance but till date no decision has been taken on the representation of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that as the petitioner is seeking a limited prayer to decide his representation submitted before the Collector, if the representation is still pending before the Collector, the same will be considered in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents and pleadings. 5. Perusal of the documents shows that the petitioner service was regularized on 13.12.2024, however, the same was cancelled immediately on the same date and for which the petitioner has submitted a representation before the Collector raising his grievance, as he has 3 been working since more than 24 years, hence, at this juncture, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Collector to decide the representation dated 15.01.2025 submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Priyanka