1 APHC010251812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12565/2025 Between: 1. M BUCHI BABU, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO AGED 52 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. BALAIAH NAGAR, NARASARAOPET(T86M), PALNADU DISTRICT(FORMER GUNTUR DIST.,) 2. THONTIA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. AMBI REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTHURU(V), Y.PALEM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YERRAGONDAPALEM POLICE STATION, Y.PALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. INAPAGOLLA VENKATA NARAYANA, S/O. PAPAIAH, AGED 79 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE R/O. 5-200, LANKONJANAPALLI ROAD, DARSI (V AND M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. INAPAGOLLA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. PAPAIAH, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE, R/O. YERRAGONDAPALEM (V AND M), PRAKASAM DIST., 6. INAPAGOLLA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, S/O. PAPAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- PVT SERVICE, R/O. 8-3-232C/23/892/A, VENKATAGIRI, YOUSUFGUDA, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P SAI SURYA TEJA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in coercing the Petitioners to settle the civil disputes with Respodnent No 4 to 6 in respect of land to an extent of Ac 908 cents of Sy No l24 of Y Palem V and M Prakasam District as illegal arbitrary without jurisdiction besides vioalation of Art 14 85 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent Police not to interfere with the civil disputes among them in respect of the subject property forthwith” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12565 of 2025 Dt.09.09.2025 Asr