Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 181914 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR @ VINOD GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8003/2024 · 2025-11-17

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8003 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that the petitioner has already passed away, as such, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Learned A.G.A. could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 17, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Ashish Shukla, Sunil Kumar Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Dhirendra Vikram Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench