1 2025:CGHC:1584 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 162 of 2025 Yuvraj Sahu S/o Late Baisakhu Ram Sahu Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Surgi, Out Post- Surgi, Tahsil/District-Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Applicant versus The State of Chhattisgarh Through SHO, Thana- Basantpur, Distt.- Rajnandgaon (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Samir Singh, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. Bharat Gulbani, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 09/01/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 478/2024 registered at Police Station - Basantpur, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.01.10 16:19:35 +0530 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 26.10.2024, OfÏcers of Police has received the secrete information from the informant with the averment that the applicant kept the liquor for the purpose of selling so the police ofÏcers have made the search and alleged to be seized about 25.200 bulk liters country made liquor, therefore, arrested the present applicant on the basis of doubt. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, out of which one case is disposed of and another one case is pending. The same has been explained in paragraph No. 4(a) of this bail application. He also submits that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case and the applicant is in jail since 26.10.2024. It is further argued by him that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the bail application. He further submits that total 25.200 bulk liters country made liquor seized from the possession of the present applicant and further the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act and the charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 3 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, out of which one case is disposed of and another one case is pending, further the charge-sheet has been filed and he is in jail since 26.10.2024. Further, the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Yuvraj Sahu, involved in Crime No. 478/2024 registered at Police Station - Basantpur, District - Rajnandgaon (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufÏcient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of BNS. 4 (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of BNS. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial Court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufÏcient cause, then it shall be open for the trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. OfÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti